<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make it fluid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estebanglas.com/2009/03/make-it-fluid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estebanglas.com/2009/03/make-it-fluid/</link>
	<description>Rambles and Riff Raff about all this and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muerte a la web miope &#124; redtácora</title>
		<link>http://estebanglas.com/2009/03/make-it-fluid/comment-page-1/#comment-7553</link>
		<dc:creator>Muerte a la web miope &#124; redtácora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estebanglas.com/?p=744#comment-7553</guid>
		<description>[...] hablé en otra ocasión (en inglés) acerca de la importancia que la diversión tiene en el proceso de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hablé en otra ocasión (en inglés) acerca de la importancia que la diversión tiene en el proceso de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban Glas</title>
		<link>http://estebanglas.com/2009/03/make-it-fluid/comment-page-1/#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban Glas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estebanglas.com/?p=744#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>Keith, 
I know I&#039;m not discovering or saying anything novel. I don&#039;t have myself in THAT kind of high esteem! 

CCE, well, how distant to that original idea it all ended up ;) 

Hopefully we are closer to it than in 2000. I left out of the post many of the implications and technicalities you are probably imagining, to keep it short and readable. 

Good to hear from you, Keith. We should talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,<br />
I know I&#8217;m not discovering or saying anything novel. I don&#8217;t have myself in THAT kind of high esteem! </p>
<p>CCE, well, how distant to that original idea it all ended up <img src='http://estebanglas.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Hopefully we are closer to it than in 2000. I left out of the post many of the implications and technicalities you are probably imagining, to keep it short and readable. </p>
<p>Good to hear from you, Keith. We should talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Watkins</title>
		<link>http://estebanglas.com/2009/03/make-it-fluid/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estebanglas.com/?p=744#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>My thought after reading this is &quot;what&#039;s old is new again.&quot;  When IBM was planning the Common Commerce Engine (CCE) project one wild, out there requirement was to not have one Public store, but to have infinite &quot;stores&quot;.  The thought was each &quot;store&quot; experience would be personalized and unique to each visitor.  This requirement was quickly put aside as the technical considerations were too big.  
Anyway, that was in 2000.  This is not said to trash your post, but to point out how we still are far from actually implementing a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thought after reading this is &#8220;what&#8217;s old is new again.&#8221;  When IBM was planning the Common Commerce Engine (CCE) project one wild, out there requirement was to not have one Public store, but to have infinite &#8220;stores&#8221;.  The thought was each &#8220;store&#8221; experience would be personalized and unique to each visitor.  This requirement was quickly put aside as the technical considerations were too big.<br />
Anyway, that was in 2000.  This is not said to trash your post, but to point out how we still are far from actually implementing a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
